Other Data Distribution Systems --> Data Distribution System:
data provision
This triple is bi-directional. See also
Data Distribution System --> Other Data Distribution Systems: data provision
Definitions
data provision (Information Flow): Data provision provides the source material for a publish-subscribe or query-retrieval data distribution scheme. This is the 1 of the 1:N data distribution architecture. This flow is a super-flow; it does not define data elements but is inclusive of any flow implemented using publish-subscribe or query-retrieval methods.
Other Data Distribution Systems (Source Physical Object): Representing another Data Distribution System, 'Other Data Distribution Systems' is intended to provide a source and destination for information exchange between peer (e.g. inter-regional) data distribution systems. It supports modeling of projects or regions that include multiple interconnected data distribution systems that together manage data distribution in the connected vehicle environment.
Data Distribution System (Destination Physical Object): The 'Data Distribution System' collects, processes, and distributes ITS data, connecting data producers with data consumers and facilitating data exchange.
Included In
This Triple is in the following Service Packages:
This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:
This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:
This Triple has the following triple relationships:
None |
Communication Solutions
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - Apache Kafka (36)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OASIS MQTT (42)
- Data for Distribution (TBD) - OASIS AMQP (45)
Selected Solution
Solution Description
ITS Application Entity
Development needed |
Click gap icons for more info.
|
||
Mgmt
Apache Zookeeper |
Facilities
Apache Kafka Apache Zookeeper |
Security
IETF RFC 8446 |
|
TransNet
|
|||
Access
Internet Subnet Alternatives |
Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.
Characteristics
Characteristic | Value |
---|---|
Time Context | Recent |
Spatial Context | Regional |
Acknowledgement | True |
Cardinality | Unicast |
Initiator | Source |
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | True |
Interoperability | Description |
---|---|
Regional | Interoperability throughout the geopolitical region is highly desirable, but if implemented differently in different transportation management jurisdictions, significant benefits will still accrue in each jurisdiction. Regardless, this Information Flow Triple should be implemented consistently within a transportation jurisdiction (i.e., the scope of a regional architecture). |
Security
Information Flow Security | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability | ||
Rating | High | High | Moderate | |
Basis | This value is derived from the specific flows satisfied by this super-flow. HIGH is set because some flows may require it. If the implementation includes flows with only a MODERATE or LOW confidentiality requirement, then this could be MODERATE or LOW, as appropriate. | This value is derived from the specific flows satisfied by this super-flow. HIGH is set because some flows may require it. If the implementation includes flows with only a MODERATE integrity requirement, then this could be MODERATE. | This value is derived from the specific flows are satisfied by this super-flow. MODERATE is set because some flows may require it. If the implementation includes flows with only a LOW availability requirement, then this could be LOW. HIGH is not considered; any flow requiring HIGH availability will not use DDS. |
Security Characteristics | Value |
---|---|
Authenticable | True |
Encrypt | True |