Registration Authority --> Misbehavior Authority:
misbehavior report

Definitions

misbehavior report (Information Flow): Notification of potential security issues encountered in processing messages, including message authentication or integrity failures, plausibility failures, or other issues appropriate to the CCMS' misbehavior policies.

Registration Authority (Source Physical Object): The 'Registration Authority' (RA) is a component of the CCMS that is the main point of contact for an end entity, and is responsible for provisioning the end entity with authorization and successor enrollment

Misbehavior Authority (Destination Physical Object): The 'Misbehavior Authority' is a component of the CCMS that receives reports of malicious or potentially malicious application activities, analyzes them, and determines whether or not to take mitigating actions.

Included In

This Triple is in the following Service Packages:

This triple is associated with the following Functional Objects:

This Triple is described by the following Functional View Data Flows:

This Triple has the following triple relationships:

Communication Solutions

  • US: Misbehavior reporting - Secure Internet (ITS) (17)
Solutions are sorted in ascending Gap Severity order. The Gap Severity is the parenthetical number at the end of the solution.

Selected Solution

US: Misbehavior reporting - Secure Internet (ITS)

Solution Description

This solution is used within Canada and the U.S.. It combines standards associated with US: Misbehavior reporting with those for I-I: Secure Internet (ITS). The US: Misbehavior reporting standards include upper-layer standards required to support misbehavior reporting services. The I-I: Secure Internet (ITS) standards include lower-layer standards that support secure communications between ITS equipment using X.509 or IEEE 1609.2 security certificates.

ITS Application Entity
Mind the gapMind the gap

Application Specific
Click gap icons for more info.

Mgmt
Facilities
Mind the gap

Development needed
Security
Mind the gapMind the gapMind the gapMind the gap

Development needed
Secure Session Alternatives
TransNet
Access

Internet Subnet Alternatives
TransNet TransNet

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Access Access

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

ITS Application ITS Application

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Mgmt Mgmt

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Facility Facility

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Security Security

TempBCL2 TempSTDL2

TempBCL3 TempSTDL3

TempBCL4 TempSTDL4

TempBCL5 TempSTDL5

Note that some layers might have alternatives, in which case all of the gap icons associated with every alternative may be shown on the diagram, but the solution severity calculations (and resulting ordering of solutions) includes only the issues associated with the default (i.e., best, least severe) alternative.

Characteristics

Characteristic Value
Time Context Recent
Spatial Context Regional
Acknowledgement True
Cardinality Unicast
Initiator Source
Authenticable True
Encrypt True


Interoperability Description
Regional Interoperability throughout the geopolitical region is highly desirable, but if implemented differently in different transportation management jurisdictions, significant benefits will still accrue in each jurisdiction. Regardless, this Information Flow Triple should be implemented consistently within a transportation jurisdiction (i.e., the scope of a regional architecture).

Security

Information Flow Security
  Confidentiality Integrity Availability
Rating Moderate Moderate Moderate
Basis


Security Characteristics Value
Authenticable True
Encrypt True